Skip to content
Containment & Tank Coatings Detroit

Containment Coatings & Tank Lining Systems in Detroit, MI

Secondary containment linings, tank coatings, and sump linings using novolac epoxy and vinyl ester systems for Detroit chemical storage, fuel distribution, and industrial containment areas.

5.0 (60+ Reviews) 20+ Years Experience 50+ In-House Crew 24/7 Operations

Secondary Containment in Metro Detroit: Where Chemical Industry Meets Environmental Sensitivity

Metro Detroit sits at the intersection of heavy chemical manufacturing, fuel distribution, and one of the most environmentally sensitive waterways in the Great Lakes basin. The Wyandotte Downriver corridor — anchored by BASF and dozens of specialty chemical operations — stores and processes concentrated acids, caustics, and aromatic solvents in above-ground tank farms with concrete berm containment. Detroit’s fuel distribution terminals stage millions of gallons of petroleum products within miles of the Detroit River. Warren’s industrial infrastructure includes process chemical storage tied to automotive and defense manufacturing.

When secondary containment linings fail in this region, the consequences extend beyond facility walls. A chemical release that reaches the Detroit River triggers not just EPA enforcement but international scrutiny — this is a shared waterway with Canada. Michigan EGLE (Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy) regulators patrol this corridor closely, and SPCC audit failures carry real penalties.

Epoxy Flooring Pro installs secondary containment linings, tank interior and exterior coatings, and waterproofing systems across Metro Detroit for chemical storage, petroleum products, waste management, and industrial process applications. Every containment project we complete includes documentation specifically structured to support SPCC plan compliance and Michigan EGLE inspection requirements.

Secondary containment berm coating with novolac epoxy lining system for chemical storage area

Understanding Coating Chemistry for Detroit’s Chemical Containment Needs

The selection of coating chemistry for containment applications is not a matter of preference — it is a technical decision driven by the specific chemical resistance requirements of your operation. The Wyandotte corridor alone handles chemical exposure profiles ranging from dilute aqueous solutions to fuming sulfuric acid. Using the wrong coating chemistry guarantees failure.

Standard Bisphenol-A Epoxy

The foundation of industrial coating technology, BPA epoxy provides good resistance to dilute acids, alkalis, water, and many salts. It is appropriate for containment of aqueous solutions, dilute chemical spills, and petroleum products at low temperatures. Standard epoxy coating is NOT adequate for concentrated aromatic solvents, concentrated acids, oxidizing chemicals, or applications requiring elevated service temperatures — conditions present in many Metro Detroit chemical and manufacturing facilities.

Novolac Epoxy

Novolac epoxy — also called epoxy novolac or phenol-formaldehyde novolac — is a specialty epoxy chemistry with a higher cross-link density than standard BPA epoxy. The additional cross-linking provides:

  • Resistance to aromatic solvents including toluene, xylene, MEK, and acetone
  • Resistance to concentrated sulfuric acid (up to 70%), hydrochloric acid, and many organic acids
  • Improved resistance to elevated temperatures (continuous service to 300°F+)
  • Higher solvent resistance for chemical process environments

For the chemical storage facilities along the Wyandotte corridor, solvent storage areas serving Metro Detroit’s automotive paint lines, and battery acid containment in the growing EV manufacturing sector, novolac epoxy is the minimum appropriate coating chemistry.

Vinyl Ester Linings

Vinyl ester systems represent the highest chemical resistance tier in commonly applied containment coatings. Based on vinyl ester resin chemistry rather than epoxy chemistry, these systems provide resistance to:

  • Fuming acids including fuming sulfuric acid and fuming nitric acid
  • Strong oxidizing chemicals including concentrated hydrogen peroxide
  • Bleach and sodium hypochlorite at concentrated levels
  • Mixed chemical exposure with unknown or variable compositions
  • Elevated temperature chemical immersion service

Vinyl ester systems require more complex application procedures and more stringent surface preparation than epoxy systems, but they are the only appropriate specification for the most demanding containment environments — including several operations we serve in the Downriver chemical district.

Vinyl ester lining application in chemical storage tank interior with fiberglass mat reinforcement

Containment Failure Points: Where Linings Break Down

Understanding where containment linings fail is essential for designing systems that withstand Detroit’s freeze-thaw cycles, seasonal groundwater fluctuation, and heavy chemical exposure. In our experience inspecting failed containment linings across Metro Detroit, failures cluster at predictable locations:

Construction Joints and Cracks

Concrete is not a monolithic material — it shrinks, moves, and develops cracks throughout its service life. Detroit’s 30+ annual freeze-thaw cycles accelerate concrete deterioration in outdoor containment berms, causing joints and cracks to widen over time. Construction joints between the berm floor and walls, control joints in large containment slabs, and structural cracks all represent discontinuities that create high stress concentrations in the coating system above.

Our approach: All joints and cracks receive specific repair treatment, followed by fiberglass woven mat embedded in the first coat of the containment lining. The fiberglass mat provides crack bridging capacity — it can accommodate small movements without the lining developing a pinhole. Mat reinforcement is applied at all joint locations as a standard practice, not an optional add-on.

Floor-to-Wall Transitions

The cove or fillet at the junction of the containment floor and the berm wall is a high-stress detail that is frequently applied incorrectly. If the coating bridges the corner without a formed cove, it spans a stress concentration point and typically cracks at the corner profile under thermal cycling. We form proper radius coves in all floor-to-wall transitions and embed fiberglass mat in the cove to ensure structural integrity of the detail.

Penetrations

Pipes, conduits, and structural elements penetrating through a containment structure are every containment engineer’s greatest concern. Each penetration is a potential bypass path for chemical to circumvent the coating system entirely. We install appropriate penetration collars, boot flashings, or mechanical seals depending on the specific penetration type and chemical exposure. All penetrations are spark-tested with particular attention because they are the highest-risk holiday locations.

Waterproofing for Detroit’s Below-Grade Infrastructure

Not all containment challenges involve chemical resistance. Detroit’s aging underground vaults, sumps, pump pits, and utility structures — many dating to the mid-20th century industrial expansion — are regularly subjected to hydrostatic groundwater pressure that drives moisture through concrete joints and cracks. The region’s high water table and clay-heavy soils compound the problem. We apply waterproofing systems that address these conditions:

Negative-Side Crystalline Waterproofing: For structures with active groundwater infiltration, crystalline waterproofing materials applied to the interior (negative side) react with water and cement to form insoluble crystals within the concrete pores, progressively sealing the substrate from within.

Positive-Side Membrane Systems: For new construction or dry substrate conditions, positive-side membrane systems applied to the exterior face of below-grade structures prevent moisture from entering the concrete in the first place.

Interior Coating Waterproofing: High-build epoxy or polyurethane systems applied to the interior of below-grade structures provide a physical barrier to moisture transmission while also offering the chemical resistance benefits appropriate for structures containing process fluids.

Concrete sump waterproofing and protective lining installation underground utility vault

SPCC and EGLE Compliance: Documentation for Detroit’s Regulatory Environment

EPA SPCC regulations and Michigan EGLE oversight impose strict requirements on secondary containment in Metro Detroit — and proximity to the Detroit River, Rouge River, and Lake St. Clair intensifies enforcement attention. For regulated facilities, our containment lining projects include documentation specifically structured to support compliance with both federal and state requirements:

  • Written specification with chemical resistance rationale for selected coating chemistry
  • Surface preparation records per SSPC standards with profile measurements
  • Application records: product lot numbers, batch quantities, mixing ratios, application temperatures and humidity
  • Film thickness measurements at specified intervals
  • Holiday test report per NACE SP0188 with all holiday locations, repair records, and retest confirmation
  • Photographs documenting all stages of surface preparation and application

This documentation package is provided at project completion and is structured for direct inclusion in your SPCC plan amendment records and EGLE compliance files.

Tank Interior Coating: Immersion Service for Detroit’s Storage Infrastructure

Tank interior coating for chemical storage, potable water, wastewater, and fuel service is among the most demanding coating application work — and among the most consequential if done incorrectly. Interior coatings experience full chemical immersion 24 hours per day and any failure of the coating system exposes the tank shell to direct chemical damage.

Surface preparation for immersion service requires abrasive blasting of steel surfaces to SSPC-SP 10 or SP 5 — near-white or white metal — because any mill scale, rust, or contamination remaining under an immersion-service coating will cause premature failure. For concrete tanks, surface preparation must achieve ICRI CSP 5–6 minimum to ensure adequate mechanical anchor profile for the thick coating systems required.

We apply immersion-service coatings in multiple coats with full cure and holiday testing between each coat, ensuring that the final system has complete coverage, correct total film thickness, and no pinholes that would allow the contained chemical to reach the substrate.

Contact our containment coating specialists to discuss your specific chemical exposure profile and receive a technically appropriate lining specification for your Detroit-area containment or tank project.

What's Included

Secondary containment linings for chemical storage berms and dyke areas
Novolac epoxy systems for aromatic solvent and concentrated acid resistance
Vinyl ester linings for fuming acid, oxidizing chemical, and solvent resistance
Waterproofing systems for below-grade vaults, sumps, and utility structures
Tank interior and exterior coatings for chemical, fuel, and water storage
Crack-bridging membrane systems for structural containment integrity
Fiberglass mat reinforcement for monolithic containment integrity
Holiday testing and spark testing for verified coating continuity

Our Containment & Tank Installation Process

01

Chemical Exposure Analysis

We begin every containment and tank coating project by obtaining the complete list of chemicals stored or handled in the containment area — including CAS numbers, concentrations, temperatures, and exposure duration scenarios. We cross-reference this list against the chemical resistance data for multiple coating system options before recommending a specification. The wrong coating chemistry will fail rapidly and potentially create a more serious release scenario than an uncoated substrate.

02

Substrate Investigation and Defect Mapping

Containment structures and tank interiors are inspected for cracks, spalls, honeycombing, construction joints, penetrations, and existing coating failure. All defects are mapped and photographed. Moisture testing is performed — containment structures are often in contact with groundwater or subjected to hydrostatic pressure that must be addressed in the specification. Any active leaks are treated before coating proceeds.

03

Surface Preparation to SSPC Standards

Concrete containment surfaces are prepared by shot blasting, grinding, or high-pressure water jetting to achieve ICRI CSP 4–6 for thick coating systems. Steel surfaces are abrasive blasted to SSPC-SP 10 (Near-White Metal) or SSPC-SP 5 (White Metal) for immersion service. All joint details, penetrations, and transitions receive specific preparation treatment. Anchor profile is measured and documented before coating proceeds.

04

Repair and Crack Bridging

All cracks, construction joints, and penetration details are treated before the primary coating is applied. Positive-side waterproofing mortars seal active leaks. Structural cracks receive [repair treatment](/concrete-joint-repair/) appropriate to the movement classification. Penetrations are fitted with appropriate collars and flashing materials. Fiberglass mat reinforcement is embedded over all joints and transition details to provide bridging capacity in the primary coating system.

05

Primary Coating System Application

The specified coating system — novolac epoxy, vinyl ester, or standard epoxy depending on chemical exposure requirements — is applied in multiple coats to achieve the specified total dry film thickness (typically 40–120 mils DFT for primary containment applications). Each coat is inspected for defects before the subsequent coat is applied. Film thickness is measured at defined intervals throughout application.

06

Holiday Testing and Acceptance

Completed coating systems on containment structures and tank interiors are subjected to holiday (spark) testing per NACE SP0188 to identify pinholes or voids that would compromise the containment integrity. Any holidays detected are repaired and retested. A written test report documenting all test locations and results is provided. Water flood testing of containment berms is available as final verification.

Why Choose Epoxy Flooring Pro

Chemical Resistance Expertise

Selecting the correct coating chemistry for chemical containment is a technical decision that requires actual knowledge of polymer chemistry and chemical resistance data — not just catalog selection. We have application experience with all major containment coating types and can explain in detail why a specific system is appropriate for your chemical exposure profile.

NACE-Informed Application Standards

Our containment and tank coating work follows NACE (now AMPP) surface preparation and application standards — the recognized technical authority for industrial corrosion protection coatings. We specify SSPC surface preparation grades, measure anchor profiles, track coating application conditions, and conduct holiday testing per applicable NACE standards.

Detail Work is Our Strength

Containment coating failures almost always occur at details: joints, penetrations, coves, and transitions. These are the areas that require the most skill and attention. Our crews are specifically trained on detail treatment for containment applications — including fiberglass mat embedding, penetration collar installation, and cove formation — because we know that the field failures happen at the details.

Holiday Testing on Every Project

We perform holiday (spark) testing on every containment application as standard procedure — not as an optional add-on. We have observed projects where holiday testing found dozens of pinholes not visible to the naked eye. In a containment application, a single pinhole allows chemical penetration to the substrate. Testing is not optional.

Documentation for Michigan EGLE Compliance

Secondary containment systems in Metro Detroit are subject to EPA SPCC requirements and Michigan EGLE (Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy) regulations — particularly near the Detroit River and Rouge River watersheds. We provide complete application documentation — surface preparation records, coating lot numbers, film thickness measurements, application conditions, and holiday test results — structured for your regulatory compliance files.

Project Gallery

Containment & Tank Coatings Detroit project 1
Containment & Tank Coatings Detroit project 2
Containment & Tank Coatings Detroit project 3
Containment & Tank Coatings Detroit project 4
Containment & Tank Coatings Detroit project 5

What Our Clients Say

"Our Wyandotte chemical processing facility stores concentrated sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide in above-ground tanks with concrete berm containment. The previous standard epoxy lining failed within two years of a sulfuric acid overflow. Epoxy Flooring Pro specified novolac epoxy for the acid-side berms and standard epoxy for the caustic berms — they understood the chemistry difference — and the new linings have held through three minor spill events without any penetration. Our EGLE inspector was impressed with the holiday test documentation."
Patricia Kaminski
EHS Director, Wyandotte Chemical Processing Plant
"Our Detroit fuel distribution terminal needed all 12 secondary containment berms relined to pass our SPCC audit. With the Detroit River less than a mile away, the environmental stakes were real. Epoxy Flooring Pro completed the relining over a six-week phased schedule without interrupting fuel operations. Every berm passed holiday testing and the SPCC auditor accepted the documentation package without modifications. We've had zero containment issues since."
James Okonkwo
Environmental Manager, Detroit Fuel Distribution Terminal
"The underground utility vaults at our Warren infrastructure facility were leaking groundwater through construction joints. Epoxy Flooring Pro sealed the active leaks, embedded fiberglass mat reinforcement at every joint, and applied a full waterproofing system. Eighteen months later, not a drop. Their documentation was thorough enough for our engineering records and our municipal compliance files."
David Nowicki
Utility Infrastructure Manager, Warren Municipal Facility

Frequently Asked Questions

What Michigan EGLE regulations apply to secondary containment in Metro Detroit?
Michigan EGLE enforces Part 31 (Water Resources Protection) and Part 111 (Hazardous Waste Management) of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, which impose requirements for secondary containment of hazardous substances. Facilities near the Detroit River, Rouge River, and Lake St. Clair face heightened scrutiny due to proximity to sensitive waterways. EPA SPCC rules apply to any facility storing more than 1,320 gallons of oil/petroleum products above ground. Our containment lining systems and documentation packages are specifically structured to satisfy both EGLE and EPA SPCC inspection requirements.
What containment coating is appropriate for chemical manufacturing facilities in the Wyandotte corridor?
The Wyandotte and Downriver chemical corridor handles concentrated acids, caustics, aromatic solvents, and specialty chemicals that require the most chemically resistant lining systems available. For concentrated sulfuric acid (above 30%), aromatic solvents, and mixed chemical exposure, novolac epoxy is the minimum specification. For fuming acids, strong oxidizers, and the most aggressive chemical profiles found in this corridor, vinyl ester lining systems are required. We cross-reference your complete chemical inventory against published resistance data before specifying — we do not guess.
How do you handle containment projects near the Detroit River watershed?
Containment failures near the Detroit River carry severe environmental and regulatory consequences — potential contamination of a shared international waterway. We treat every project within the Detroit River and Rouge River watersheds with additional design rigor: minimum 60-mil DFT systems with fiberglass mat reinforcement at all joints, 100% holiday testing at both intermediate and final coat stages, and flood testing of completed berms when practical. Documentation is structured for both EPA and EGLE reporting requirements.
Can you coat fuel storage containment berms at an operating distribution terminal?
Yes. Metro Detroit has multiple fuel distribution facilities that cannot shut down operations for containment relining. We develop phased work plans that reline berms one or two at a time while adjacent containment areas remain in service. We coordinate with your operations and environmental teams to ensure regulatory containment coverage is maintained throughout the project. Typical project duration for a 10–12 berm terminal is 6–8 weeks.
What documentation do you provide for SPCC plan updates after containment relining?
Every containment lining project includes a documentation package structured for direct inclusion in your SPCC plan: written specification with chemical resistance rationale, SSPC surface preparation records with profile measurements, product lot numbers and application conditions, film thickness measurements at specified intervals, holiday test report per NACE SP0188, and dated photographs of all stages. This package satisfies EPA SPCC audit documentation requirements and Michigan EGLE inspection expectations.

Get a Free Estimate for Containment & Tank

Our project managers are ready to assess your facility and recommend the optimal containment & tank solution.